Project on the Economics of Climate Adaptation and Forests
(ECAF)
College of Agricultural Sciences |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Track #1: Empirical analysis of climate adaptation
behavior by forest landowners |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Principal
research question:
How do forest landowners adapt their management behavior to their current
climate, and what does this suggest about how they might modify their
behavior to climate change? |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Relationship between climate and the current stock of
forest types for the US west coast |
-This
figure shows the basic relationship between tree species and climate for
California, Oregon and Washington using data from over 6,000 non-federal
timber plots from FIA -Hardwoods
are found in warmer climates while Fir/Spruce are found in colder climates -Hemlock/Sitka
Spruce are found in the wettest climates while Ponderosa Pine and Other
Softwood are found in the driest climates |
|||||||||||
Objective 1: Develop U.S. west coast and
national econometric models of forest management, and use the models to test
for the effects of climate on management choices by landowners. We examine
how variation in key climate variables affects the probability of i)
harvesting, ii) replanting certain forest types after harvest, and iii)
natural disturbance? |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Structure of Econometric Model for US West Coast |
-Discrete choice econometric analysis using a nested logit
framework -Landowners choose intensity of harvest decision -Conditional on the harvest decision, landowners choose the
species to regenerate (if cut) or a natural disturbance event may occur (if
not cut) -Key drivers of forest management include: timber prices,
expected timber volume growth, species-specific rents, site productivity,
elevation, climate |
|||||||||||
Econometric Results for US West Coast Partial
effects of $10/acre rent increase on probability of replanting Douglas-fir |
-Rents per acre - a measure of profitability - are key
drivers of forest management decisions in the econometric model -Rents vary across regions and across forest types, and are
closely linked to timber yield curves to the left. -The econometric model scales regional average rents to downscaled
climate measures. -Econometric results (to the left) provide evidence that
landowners will be less likely to replant Douglas-fir under the warmer future
climates. |
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Objective 2: Use the econometric model as
the basis for a landscape simulation to depict the effects of climate change
on the state of U.S. forests and the resulting composition of tree species. |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Schematic of landscape simulation
|
-The
landscape simulation is driven by econometric estimates of forest management
decisions - these generate rules for land-use decisions -The
simulated landscape depicts changes in the forest in 10-year tie steps, where
forest growth is tracked through empirical yield curves -Land-use
decisions are updated as climate conditions and/or policy changes |
|||||||||||
Simulation
Results: Simulated
effects of climate change by 2100: Change in Douglas-fir's total shares
(left) and hardwoods (right) resulting from climate change
|
-Relative
to a baseline without climate change, simulations suggest that climate change
reduces the share of private forests in Douglas-fir -Relative
to a baseline without climate change, simulations suggest that climate change
increases the share of private forests in hardwoods. -
Landowners adapt to
climate change by gradually shifting out of their current dominant species
choice of Douglas-fir to species more suitable for the future climate,
notably hardwoods and ponderosa pine. |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Objective 3: Examine the effects of
multiple carbon price scenarios on the adaptive behavior of forest landowners
and the resulting forested landscape. We examine whether climate mitigation
policy encourages more or less adaptation towards new forest types in
different regions of the U.S. |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Carbon
yield curves: Rents
for highest site productivity class in Western Oregon with current timber
prices. |
-A
carbon price generates rental payments to landowners. -Under
a carbon price, land is “rented” for timber production and for carbon
sequestration. -Timber
rents and carbon rents vary across forest types. |
|||||||||||
Simulation
results: Simulated
combined impact of climate change and a carbon price on the share of private
forests in Douglas-fir (left) and hardwoods (right)
|
-Relative
to a baseline with climate change, a carbon price accelerates the adaptation
away from Douglas-fir and towards hardwoods in the western portion of the
Pacific Northwest. - The
carbon price rewards the climate-induced relative shift in productivity away
from Douglas-fir to hardwoods. |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Research Papers Hashida,
Y., and D.J. Lewis. 2018. The intersection between climate adaptation,
mitigation, and natural resources: An empirical analysis of forest
management. Journal of the Association
of Environmental and Resource Economists (Forthcoming). (PDF
version) (Supplementary
appendix) |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Sources of funding support |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
USDA Forest Service Pacific
Northwest Research Station USDA Forest Service Southern
Research Station |
USDA National Institute for
Food and Agriculture |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Last updated: 9/25/2018 |
|
|||||||||||